<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Recharge your controllers through thin air</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aeropause.com/2009/09/recharge-your-controllers-through-thin-air/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2009/09/recharge-your-controllers-through-thin-air/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=recharge-your-controllers-through-thin-air</link>
	<description>Aeropause is a video game blog that explores game culture, trends, technologies and innovations</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 05:19:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2009/09/recharge-your-controllers-through-thin-air/comment-page-1/#comment-30948</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 05:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/?p=24745#comment-30948</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll stick with my rechargable batteries. Seems more reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll stick with my rechargable batteries. Seems more reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2009/09/recharge-your-controllers-through-thin-air/comment-page-1/#comment-28309</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 22:05:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/?p=24745#comment-28309</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll stick with my rechargable batteries. Seems more reliable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll stick with my rechargable batteries. Seems more reliable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mclazyj</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2009/09/recharge-your-controllers-through-thin-air/comment-page-1/#comment-28300</link>
		<dc:creator>mclazyj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:38:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/?p=24745#comment-28300</guid>
		<description>They were showing this tech at CES earlier this year, and it is pretty cool to finally see it actually happening.  The big thing was the idea of building this into standard materials, like a countertop area, so you could just slide an appliance on to an area and it would power it on, slide it off that area and it would power off.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Wireless power was even more amazing.  They showed a power coil that would oscillate behind a picture, and a power receiver on the other end would oscillate back, and the two waves would cause friction, and thereby creating power.  It was only good over a 5-7 foot range, but imagine getting rid of all the cables behind the TV with something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They were showing this tech at CES earlier this year, and it is pretty cool to finally see it actually happening.  The big thing was the idea of building this into standard materials, like a countertop area, so you could just slide an appliance on to an area and it would power it on, slide it off that area and it would power off.</p>
<p>The Wireless power was even more amazing.  They showed a power coil that would oscillate behind a picture, and a power receiver on the other end would oscillate back, and the two waves would cause friction, and thereby creating power.  It was only good over a 5-7 foot range, but imagine getting rid of all the cables behind the TV with something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

