Culture.Pause | Aeropause Games



Play the best online craps on the net and win big.


Get great Dish Network channels like the G4 Gaming Network from US Dish.

Comments



Advertise Here

Site Friends

  • AeroPolls

    • What is your favorite part of the Aeropodcast?

      View Results

      Loading ... Loading ...




  • AeroTeam

    Editor-in-Chief
    Shane Whitehouse

    West Coast Contributor/Podcast Manager
    Joseph Haygood

    East Coast Contributor
    Stephen Munn

    East Coast Contributor
    Paul Munn

    Central Contributor
    Richard Windsor

    East Coast Contributor
    Joe Fourhman

    Great Lakes Contributor
    Mike Koss

    UK Contributor
    Vikki Blake

    UK Contributor
    Adam Englebright


    AeroTags


    Channels

    Podcasts


    Latest Game Reviews


    Nintendo Power Read-a-Long



    Video Game Jobs


    AeroLinks

    Forums
    RSS
    About Us
    Contact Us
    Become an Author
    Contests
    Advertising

    Forums



    Podcasts




    Vista Service Pack 1 Test Drive

    By Joe Haygood | December 14, 2007

    VistaSP1 install.jpg

    Being the risk taker that I am, I downloaded and installed the RC1 candidate for Windows Vista, and I have put together some thoughts on it. Overall, the Service Pack seems to make things a little quicker, but I have yet to find a truly compelling feature that is selling me on the upgrade. Keep reading to see some of the issues I have had with Vista, and whether this patch has fixed them, left them alone or made them worse.


    Well, the first thing you need to know about this upgrade is that it makes you jump through some hoops to get it. While there is a full IT Professionals full patch for download, a lot of times, it is way larger than you will need, so it is not really recommended. The first thing you have to do is trick Windows Update into finding the Service Pack. That can be done via this patch from Microsoft. Sounds easy, except now it will take three more reboots before you get the update, because there are several other critical components that will get installed first, and they will require reboots.

    Downloading the patch was pretty straight-forward. Demand is high for the patch right now, which is slowing down the download speeds. It took me about 35 minutes to download 77.9 MBs, which was determined by looking at the fixes I had already installed. The install follows most of the same steps that went into XP Service Pack 2. The install runs a few items, and then shuts down the machine. During shutdown, it goes through a three tiered install process. Total time to login screen from the start of the patching process was about 65 minutes.

    The sign in process still seems to take a long time from cold start to the last line of the startup file. It seems that they have not optimized the boot process, still opting for people to use the suspend feature to make them feel that the computer is booting faster. I would of thought this would be a major priority, but it seems to have been bypassed.

    Upon logging in, the first weird item occurred, which was the update to Live Messenger. Not sure if this is part of the update or it installed it because it was already on the system, but could be an annoyance for those that don’t use the product if it is installed automatically without a way to opt out of it.
    The system did not seem any faster, although in some game tests, I did notice a boost by maybe a couple of frames a second in Crysis and World in Conflict, but strangely, I noticed slowdowns in Gears of War and Kane and Lynch, both Live for Windows games. Changing the detail level of shadows seemed to bring up the frame rate, but it will not bode well for those that are hoping for speed improvements in games.

    Also, there are still some browser instabilities that I have not been able to get past. Seems every now and then, IE7 seems to just lock up. Normally happens on certain pages, which I think have a lot of JavaScript. I was hoping this would be patched, but it does not appear to be at this time.

    One thing that was of note, and this had been mentioned in several publications was the change in text for those of us that own Vista Ultimate. We were supposed to be getting all of these extra downloads, which so far have amounted to Language packs, Texas Hold’em, Dreamscape screen saver and the Bitlocker EPS upgrade. Well the text of that page has been change. Instead of the flowing paragraphs that mention the program all the updates we will receive, it has been whittled down to a two sentence section stating that these are add-ons. No mention anymore of how many or how often, so it looks like Ultimate users got shafted on this one.

    Ultimately, the upgrade to SP1 at this time has not really shown me any net changes in the OS. The final component will have more features in it when it hits in January, but as of now, this will not help anyone make the decision to switch to the new platform for games. Unless people see significant frame rate increases, there is nothing that will make a gamer switch to Vista, even with this Service Pack.

    Tags: , , , , , ,

    Topics: Microsoft, PC | Comments

    Enjoy this article? You may also like:
    • billm
      I have a laptop with Vista on it, the specs on the laptop are pretty decent, a dual core pentium running at 1.86ghz, 2gigs of ram and an NVIDIA GeForce Go 7400 at 128mb. Not a bad set up for a laptop if you ask me, but I still have problems playing half life on it, frames drop like crazy. I know i can't play bioshock with those specs nor do i expect it, but i feel i should at least be able to play halflife! I am considering "downgrading" to XP, i figure with those specs XP will run very fast. And it's not just gaming, like you said it takes forever to boot up, and I just feel I would have a much faster and smoother experience with XP. what do you guys think I should do?
    • I would wait until SP1 is final. If it still sucks donkey nads, downgrade.
    • One thing that I see from your specs is the 128MB video card. You are going to get killed on Vista with that card. You really want to run Vista with at least 256MB of video RAM. The front end desktop interface is developed as a true 3D engine, require more use of your Video card.

      You can turn off a lot of that stuff, but even then, the OS is putting a strain on that Video card. I would downgrade to XP if I was you, if you are looking for performance benefits. Source engine games can be finiky at times, so you may have to play with the settings to get a smooth bug free experience.
    blog comments powered by Disqus