<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hockey Sim Development Ended By Piracy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aeropause.com/2007/02/hockey-sim-development-ended-by-piracy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/02/hockey-sim-development-ended-by-piracy/</link>
	<description>Aeropause is a video game blog that explores game culture, trends, technologies and innovations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:54:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/02/hockey-sim-development-ended-by-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18292</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 15:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/02/hockey-sim-development-ended-by-piracy/#comment-18292</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, I don&#039;t buy into this whole &quot;piracy killed our game.&quot;

See my previous post on the subject:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aeropause.com/archives/2006/07/piracy_vs_crap/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.aeropause.com/archives/2006/07/piracy_vs_crap/&lt;/a&gt;

GalCiv2 is supposedly a niche game, as well, and is distributed digitally. Granted, they sold boxes as well, being the highest sold software at Wal-mart for a while.

No, sorry. If anything, the game was probably poorly marketed. I had never heard of it until this post, and I usually like games like this. But whatever, failing companies have to save face somehow.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, I don&#8217;t buy into this whole &#8220;piracy killed our game.&#8221;</p>
<p>See my previous post on the subject:<br />
<a href="http://www.aeropause.com/archives/2006/07/piracy_vs_crap/" rel="nofollow">http://www.aeropause.com/archives/2006/07/piracy_vs_crap/</a></p>
<p>GalCiv2 is supposedly a niche game, as well, and is distributed digitally. Granted, they sold boxes as well, being the highest sold software at Wal-mart for a while.</p>
<p>No, sorry. If anything, the game was probably poorly marketed. I had never heard of it until this post, and I usually like games like this. But whatever, failing companies have to save face somehow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will Maiden</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/02/hockey-sim-development-ended-by-piracy/comment-page-1/#comment-18291</link>
		<dc:creator>Will Maiden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2007 14:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/02/hockey-sim-development-ended-by-piracy/#comment-18291</guid>
		<description>I dont know about this one. As much as I deplore video game piracy, blaming the folding of game development on its shoulders is a bit much.

The game was available solely through digital distribution but like so many, chose to distribute it themselves instead of attaching themselves to a proven and trusted system like &#039;Steam&#039;. As such, it was leaked to bit-torrent and made freely available. Surely digital distribution means that you can spend more focus on anti-piracy measures, pass codes, online subscription etc. There are ways and means to make sure that people who play are those that paid.

In actuality, isnt it more likely that a niche genre game (Eastside hockey management) was released through a niche medium (digital download) thus limiting those who can buy it, passing trade in shops and a lot of marketting so people dont even know the title exists.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont know about this one. As much as I deplore video game piracy, blaming the folding of game development on its shoulders is a bit much.</p>
<p>The game was available solely through digital distribution but like so many, chose to distribute it themselves instead of attaching themselves to a proven and trusted system like &#8216;Steam&#8217;. As such, it was leaked to bit-torrent and made freely available. Surely digital distribution means that you can spend more focus on anti-piracy measures, pass codes, online subscription etc. There are ways and means to make sure that people who play are those that paid.</p>
<p>In actuality, isnt it more likely that a niche genre game (Eastside hockey management) was released through a niche medium (digital download) thus limiting those who can buy it, passing trade in shops and a lot of marketting so people dont even know the title exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
