<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Wind Waker to Wii, Phantom Hourglass interacts?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/</link>
	<description>Aeropause is a video game blog that explores game culture, trends, technologies and innovations.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:57:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: XAQ! (aeropause)</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/comment-page-1/#comment-17652</link>
		<dc:creator>XAQ! (aeropause)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 02:28:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/#comment-17652</guid>
		<description>While Windwaker is definately one of my favorite Zelda games (my first post on Aeropause was a Top Five Zelda article, and Windwaker was in it), I don&#039;t think I would like this. Other developers are going to be looking up to the big N and walking in their footsteps and a move like this might show them  that it is o.k. to slack off and remake, sorry, Wiimake some older games. I, like many others, don&#039;t want that. I want something fresh and new. And I honestly doubt that there is a new Zelda of a year in development. People like to take breaks between games, not start one before the other is even finished.

But I hope it doesn&#039;t happen. MO.


Also: Stephen. Are you sure it was only 8 hours? I&#039;m pretty sure my play time was over 20 or maybe in the 30&#039;s but I can&#039;t really remember. You might be right.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While Windwaker is definately one of my favorite Zelda games (my first post on Aeropause was a Top Five Zelda article, and Windwaker was in it), I don&#8217;t think I would like this. Other developers are going to be looking up to the big N and walking in their footsteps and a move like this might show them  that it is o.k. to slack off and remake, sorry, Wiimake some older games. I, like many others, don&#8217;t want that. I want something fresh and new. And I honestly doubt that there is a new Zelda of a year in development. People like to take breaks between games, not start one before the other is even finished.</p>
<p>But I hope it doesn&#8217;t happen. MO.</p>
<p>Also: Stephen. Are you sure it was only 8 hours? I&#8217;m pretty sure my play time was over 20 or maybe in the 30&#8217;s but I can&#8217;t really remember. You might be right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/comment-page-1/#comment-17651</link>
		<dc:creator>jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/#comment-17651</guid>
		<description>i loved wind waker! i was hoping theyd make another cell shaded game
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i loved wind waker! i was hoping theyd make another cell shaded game</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBrain</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/comment-page-1/#comment-17650</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/#comment-17650</guid>
		<description>Miyamoto did talk about re-releasing GC games with motion control at a significantly lower price. So if this does indeed happen, expect the game to be 19.99-29.99. The Twilight Princess deal shows that Nintendo isn&#039;t afraid to release the same game on different consoles (Hell, look at the SNES to GBA ports, heh).
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miyamoto did talk about re-releasing GC games with motion control at a significantly lower price. So if this does indeed happen, expect the game to be 19.99-29.99. The Twilight Princess deal shows that Nintendo isn&#8217;t afraid to release the same game on different consoles (Hell, look at the SNES to GBA ports, heh).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subnet6</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/comment-page-1/#comment-17649</link>
		<dc:creator>Subnet6</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 19:26:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/#comment-17649</guid>
		<description>While I actually like the idea of a &quot;director&#039;s cut&quot; with changes and added content, it doesn&#039;t seem likely.  Nintendo doesn&#039;t seem excited to alter content that has already been released.  My guess is the best we can hope for is re-release of wind waker with updated controls.

My problem is that this might get overdone.  I really loved windwaker and I would love to see another game in that graphical style, however, I&#039;m impatient to move beyond last gen and really explore the possibilities of the Wii as a new system.  I don&#039;t want to get bogged down with remakes and re-releases if we can help it.  My fear is that devs would get lazy and instead of new IP, they would rerelease old content.

So, yeah, I would love what you are describing but I would fear the ramifications for the future if it was a success financially.

Oh, and if they sell it in stores, no more than $29.99 at launch, with a $19.99 drop pretty quickly.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I actually like the idea of a &#8220;director&#8217;s cut&#8221; with changes and added content, it doesn&#8217;t seem likely.  Nintendo doesn&#8217;t seem excited to alter content that has already been released.  My guess is the best we can hope for is re-release of wind waker with updated controls.</p>
<p>My problem is that this might get overdone.  I really loved windwaker and I would love to see another game in that graphical style, however, I&#8217;m impatient to move beyond last gen and really explore the possibilities of the Wii as a new system.  I don&#8217;t want to get bogged down with remakes and re-releases if we can help it.  My fear is that devs would get lazy and instead of new IP, they would rerelease old content.</p>
<p>So, yeah, I would love what you are describing but I would fear the ramifications for the future if it was a success financially.</p>
<p>Oh, and if they sell it in stores, no more than $29.99 at launch, with a $19.99 drop pretty quickly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/comment-page-1/#comment-17648</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 18:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/#comment-17648</guid>
		<description>Idiotic would be lying to you and telling you my total play time on the game, which the game kept meticulous track of, was significantly longer than eight hours, WOPR.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Idiotic would be lying to you and telling you my total play time on the game, which the game kept meticulous track of, was significantly longer than eight hours, WOPR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WOPR</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/comment-page-1/#comment-17647</link>
		<dc:creator>WOPR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/#comment-17647</guid>
		<description>Why do people come out with such idiotic statements like Wind Waker lasting only 8 hours?
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people come out with such idiotic statements like Wind Waker lasting only 8 hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.aeropause.com/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/comment-page-1/#comment-17646</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 17:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aeropause.com/wordpress/2007/01/wind-waker-to-wii-phantom-hourglass-interacts/#comment-17646</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I have thought about Nintendo doing something with Wind Waker for the Wii but I was thinking more of an update/patch you download for the current GC game. I would hate to buy the game again for $50 but for $5 or free, I would relive Wind Waker for the 3rd time.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I have thought about Nintendo doing something with Wind Waker for the Wii but I was thinking more of an update/patch you download for the current GC game. I would hate to buy the game again for $50 but for $5 or free, I would relive Wind Waker for the 3rd time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
